PERBEDAAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI AKADEMIK DITINJAU DARI GAYA ATRIBUSI PADA MAHASISWA FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UNIVERSITAS HKBP NOMMENSEN MEDAN

Romiliska Sitanggang; Asina Christina  Rosito

doi:10.51622/eksakta.v6i1.2798

Authors

Romiliska Sitanggang Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan
Asina Christina Rosito Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51622/eksakta.v6i1.2798

Keywords:

achievement motivation, attribution style

Abstract

This study aims to test whether there are differences in achievement motivation in terms of attributional style among students of the Faculty of Psychology, University of HKBP Nommensen. The sample in this study was 197 active students of the Faculty of Psychology, HKBP Nommensen University. The research instrument used were the achievement motivation scale and the attribution style scale. The results of the study using the ANOVA test showed that there were significant differences in achievement motivation in terms of attributional style (F= 2.75, p < 0.05).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adelia, V. (2012). Metode Mengajar Anak di Luar Kelas (Outdoor study). Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.

Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Atkinson, J. (1982). Motivation and Achievement. Washington, D.C: V.H. winston and Sons. Atkinson. (1974). Personality, Motivation, and Achievement. Washington.

Azwar, S. (2008). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

BKF Kementerian Keuangan. (2020). CNBC Indonesia, Jakarta. Diakses di https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200603112626-8-162683/segini-kerugian- indonesia-akibat-pandemi-covid-19/

Benölken, R. (2014). Gender- and giftedness-specific differences in mathematical selfconcepts, attributions and interests. Social and Behavioral Sciences 174, 464 – 473.

Bungin, B. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. Chaplin, J.P. (2006). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Parsada.

Clelland, M. (2010). Prestasi akademik dan Karakteristik akademik. Universitas Negeri Malang. Degeng, I.N.S. (1997). Strategi Pembelajaran, Mengorganisasi Isi dengan Model Elaborasi.

Malang: IKIP Malang bekerja sama dengan Biro Penerbitan Ikatan Profesi Teknologi Pendidikan.

Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying Achievement Goals and Their Impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541.

Hadi, S. ( 2000). Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta : Andi Yogyakarta.

Heider, F. (2010). “Teori Atribusi Merupakan Teori yang Menjelaskan Tentang Perilaku Seseorang”, http://www.docstoc.com/docs/57790860/Teoriatribusi-merupakan-teori- yang-menjelaskan-tentang-perilaku-seseorang.

Hassaskhah, J & Vahab, M. (2010). An in-depth analysis of the relationship between age and attribution in EFL contexts. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 5 , 2126–2132.

Iksan, M. (2015). Atribusi kegagalan berprestasi siswa SMP dan siswa SMA. Program studi psikologi universitas gajayana malang, Volume 10, No 2, Oktober.

Kuspitorini, E. (1997).Perbedaan motivasi berprestasi ditinjau dari atribusi pada Mahasiswa.

Skripsi. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya.

Marliani, R. (2008). Hubungan antara gaya atribusi dengan tingkat prestasi akademik. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Ilmu Pendidikan dan Perkembangan. 1, 1, 33-46.

Melbourne, D. A. (2014). A New Method For Testing Normality Based Upon A Characterization Of The Normal Distribution. Thesis.

Omrod, J.E. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Purwanto, E. (2014). Model Motivasi Trisula: Sintesis Baru Teori Motivasi Berprestasi. Jurnal Psikologi. Volume 41, No. 2, Desember 2014: 218 – 228.

Samsuar. (2019).Atribusi. Jurnal Network Media. 2, 1, 65-69.

Tandya, I. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Penyelesaian Studi Dua Mahasiswa Ditinjau Dari Teori Atribusi. Jurnal Psiko-Edukasi. volume 17, 46-68.

Savas, B & Iiyas, Y. (2010). Investigating causal atribution of success and failure on mathematic of student in turkish high schools. Ataturk Education: Marmara University.

Seifert, T. L. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222421.

Singh, K. (2011). Study of Achievement Motivation in Relation to Academic Achievement of Students. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 1(2), 161–171. Retrieved from http://www.ripublication.com/ijepa.htm

Simanjuntak, W. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi belajar. Kompasiana. Diakses dari http://www.kompasiana.com/wantisimanjuntak/faktor-faktor-yang-mempengaruhi- prestasi-belajar_552e34eb6ea 83482208b456d pada 2 April 2021.

Sobur, A. (2006).Psikologi umum. Bandung: Pustaka setia.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, N.J: General

Learning Press.

Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. Newyork: Psychology press

Wilson, T.D., & Damiani, M., & Shelton, N. (2002). Improving The Academic Performance Of College Student With Brief Attributional. University Harvard Press.