Strategi Pembuktian yang Dilakukan oleh Penuntut Umum dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Subulussalam)

Abstract

Evidence as an effort to disclose and enforce the law on a case or suspicion of a criminal occurance of corruption is not something simple and easy. The success of the prosecution cannot be separated from the quality of the results of the investigation. The problems in this research are what is the evidence strategy performed by the Public Prosecutor that reveals happened criminal occurrence of corruption  and any obstacles faced by the Public Prosecutor reveals happened criminal occurrence of corruption (Research at the Subulussalam District Attorney). This research is the type of empirical juridical  research with law approach, conceptual approach and case approach to collect the primary data by conducting interviews with The Prosecutor as The Public Prosecutor who plays a role in proving that there has been a criminal act of corruption in the Subulussalam District Attorney as well as other secondary data. Based on the results of the research conducted, found that efforts to prove were not only based on what was contained in the Criminal Procedure Code, but required improvisation by the Public Prosecutor. A strong prosecution based on a good investigation. Therefore, starting from the existence of reports of criminal acts of corruption, investigations, prosecutions to legal remedies must be carried out carefully, innovatively, and synergize between parties. Then the obstacles experienced by the Public Prosecutor are that it takes a long time for The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia to declare state losses and the limited location of the Corruption Court has resulted in inefficient time and energy.