TINDAK PIDANA MELAKUKAN KEJAHATAN DENGAN SENGAJA DAN TANPA HAK ATAU MELAWAN HUKUM, MELAKUKAN INTERSEPSI ATAU PENYADAPAN ATAS INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK DAN/ATAU DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK TERTENTU MILIK ORANG LAIN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 282/PID.SUS/2020.PN.MKS)

Authors

  • Octa Franda Panahatan Lumbantobing Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Lesson Sihotang Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Jinner Sidauruk Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Keywords:

Criminal liability,, electronic documents,, liability

Abstract

The virtual world and the convenience of existing technology are often used by individuals who use  this cyber world for personal gain without thinking about the interests of others and moral values, for example, we often hear the term hackers or privacy burglars or wiretapping. Tapping is an activity to listen, record, bend, change. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the
responsibility for criminal acts against the perpetrators who intercept or intercept electronic information or electronic documents of decision study number 282/PID.SUS/2020.PN.MKS? What is the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a crime against the perpetrator who committed a crime intentionally and without rights or against the law, interception or wiretapping of electronic
information and/or certain electronic documents belonging to others with the study of decision number 282/PID.SUS/2020.PN. MKS?. In an effort to achieve the objectives of this research, the research method used is a normative juridical approach. Criminal liability is the responsibility of a  person for a criminal act he has committed, based on the actions committed by the defendant having  carried out an act of wiretapping or interception. The judge in deciding this case is based on etc. as well as non-juridically: looking at the psychological, philosophical, etc. side. So with the facts revealed at the trial 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-05-27