The Effect of SABELS and GRPQ on The Students’ Reading Comprehension at SMA Swasta RK Bintang Timur Pematangsiantar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this research is to find out the effect of Scientific Approach-Based on English Learning
Strategy (SABELS) and Guided Reading Peer Questioning Strategy (GRPQ) on students’ reading
comprehension at grade X of SMA Swasta RK Bintang Timur Pematang Siantar. The researchers
used quantitative method. The mean of GRPQ strategy is 77.50, Standard Deviation is 7.75, and
significance value is .002 and number of students is 36. The mean in SABELS strategy is 80.00 and
standard deviation is 9.25, and significance value is 0.38 and number of students is 36. The class
who got conventional strategy, it has mean 75.00, standard deviation is 7.50, and significance value
is .000 and number of students is 37. Using t-test in analyzing data, is found that t-value (2,36) is
higher that t-table (1,667) at level of significant 5 %. This means using SABELS is effective to
develop students’ ability in reading comprehension. According to the research findings, it is
concluded that SABELS is more significant than GRPQ Strategy in teaching reading comprehension
at tenth grade students at SMA Swasta RK Bintang Timur Pematangsiantar.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Allington, R., Strange, M. 1980. Learning Through Reading in the Content Area.
Massachusetts: D.C Health and Company.
Anderson, M., Anderson, K. 2003.Text Types. South Yarra: Macmillan Education AustraliaPTY Ltd.
Anderson, L.W., Kratwohl, D.R. 2001.A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing:
A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. Boston: Pearson Education
group.
Ary, D., Jacob, L., Soensen, C. 2010.Introduction to Research in Education.8th.Edition. USA:
WARDSWORTH Cengage Learning.
Boardman, A., Klinger. J. K., Vaughn. S. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students
with Learning Difficulties. New Work: The Guilford Press.
Brown, H. D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York:
Pearson Education Inc.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. 2000. Research Method in Education 5th.Edition. London:
Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. 2009.Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method
Approaches. 3rd. Edition. UK: SAGE Publication.
Daryanto. 2013. PendekatanPembelajaranSaintifikKurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava
Media.
Davies, F. 1995. Introducing Reading. England: Penguin Book Publisher.
Gillingham, A., Stillman, B.W. 1960. Remedial Training. New York: Gillingham Publisher.
Grellet, F. 1981. Developing Reading Skills: A Practical Guide to Reading Comprehension
Exercises. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. 2001.The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education
Limited.
Hatch, E.M., Farhady, H. 1982.Research Design and Statistic for Applied Linguistics. Rowley,
Massachusetts: Newbury House, Heaton.
Heilman, W. A. 1981. Principles and Practices Reading 5
th.Edition.Eashington: A Bell and
Howel Company.
Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. USA: Michigan University Press.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. 1991. Learning Together and Alone.Massachussetts: Allin and
Bacon.
Knapp, P., Watkins, M. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and
Assessing Writing. Australia: New South Wales University Press.
Musfiqon, H.M., Nurdyansyah. 2015. PendekatanPembelajaranSaintifik. Sidoarjo: Nizamia
Learning Center.
Napitupulu, S., Siahaan, S., Siahaan, S., Manalu, D.B. 2018.Scientific Approach-Based English
Learning Strategy. Medan: KementerianHukumdan HAM RI.
Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and Learning.Massachussetts:
Heinle&Heinle Publisher.
Richards, J.C., Rodgers, T.S. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A
Description and Analysis. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Scott, W.A., Ytreberg, L.H. 2004.Teaching English to Children. London: Longman.
Sundayana, W. 2015.Readiness and Competence of Senior High School English Teachers to
Implement Curriculum 2013.Indonesian Journal of Applied Lingusitic. Vol. 5 (1): Hlm.
-35.