Perlindungan Hukum Terhaadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas dalam Forced Delisting Saham (Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51622/vsh.v6i1.2802Keywords:
Pasar modal; Pemegang Saham: RegulasiAbstract
The capital market is an important financial instrument that functions to raise long-term funds through the sale of securities. Its success depends on effective regulations to protect all market participants, especially minority shareholders. In Indonesia, existing regulations are still considered weak in providing legal protection for minority shareholders affected by forced delisting, as seen in the case of PT Davomas Abadi Tbk in 2015. This case illustrates that corporate violations and failure to fulfill information disclosure obligations can cause losses for minority shareholders. Therefore, regulatory evaluation and strengthening are necessary to create a transparent and secure investment climate. As a comparison, the United States implements a transparent delisting mechanism and provides trading alternatives through the Over The Counter (OTC) market, which many developing countries, including Indonesia, do not yet have. By studying practices in the U.S., Indonesia can enhance legal protection for minority shareholders and create a healthier and more investor-friendly capital market.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Wirayudha Nugraha, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Atas Tindakan Forced delisting Perusahaan Tercatat Oleh Bursa Efek Indonesia”, Lex Librum, Vol.7 No.2, Juni 2021.
Alfen Dwi Putra dan Ariawan Gunandi, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Saham Publik Terhadap Perusahaan Tercatat Yang Dihapus Pencatatan Efeknya Dalam Rangka Keterbukaan Informasi (Contoh Kasus: Pt Inovisi Infracom Tbk (Invs)Tahun 2017)”, Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol. 4 Nomor 2, Desember 2021.
Andri Gunawan Wibisana, “Menulis di Jurnal Hukum: Gagasan, Struktur dan Gaya”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 49 No. 2, 2019.
Citra Senna, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Atas Diberlakukannya Forced delisting Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Dan Akibat Hukumnya”, Dinamika, Vol. 26 No.1, Februari 2020.
Firas Rukmana.K , Hendro Saptopno , dan Sartika Nanda, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Pada Pt Dayaindo Resources International Tbk Yang Mengalami Delisting” Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 6 No.2, 2017.
Gunawan Widjaja dan Wulandari Risnamanitis, Seri Pengetahuan Pasar modal Go Public dan Go Private di Indonesia, Cetakan ke 1, Kencana, Jakarta: Januari 2009.
I Dewa Gede Angga Bhasudeva, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, dan Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti, “Perlindungan Hukum Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Investor Pasar Modal Atas Diberlakukannya Delisting Saham Oleh Bursa Efek Indonesia”, Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 2, Mei 2022.
Ida Bagus Rama Pratistha, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha dan Desak Gde Dwi Arini, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Investor Karena Adanya Penghapusan Pencatatan (Forced delisting) Perusahaan Terbuka Di Pasar Modal”, Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 1, Januari 2022.
Inda Rahadiyan dan Diah Ayu Ambarsari, “Ketiadaan Batas Waktu Suspensi dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Investor Pasar Modal Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 25 Issue 2, Mei 2018.
Li, Mingsheng, Karen Liu, and Xiaorui Zhu, ‘The Effects of NASDAQ Delisting on Firm Performance’, Research in International Business and Finance , 67.1 (2024), 1021<https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102101>
Munir Fuady, Pasar Modal Modern, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2001.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhamad Alfian Dwiki Darmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
