URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN BADAN PERADILAN KHUSUS DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PILKADA LANGSUNG

Authors

  • Yonata Harefa Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Haposan Siallagan Universitas HKBP Nommensen
  • Hisar Siregar Universitas HKBP Nommensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.342

Keywords:

Direct Election, Authority, Constitutional Court, Specialized Judiciary

Abstract

In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-07-30

How to Cite

Harefa, Y. ., Siallagan, H., & Siregar, H. (2020). URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN BADAN PERADILAN KHUSUS DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PILKADA LANGSUNG . Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 1(01), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.342

Issue

Section

Articles