Pemidanaan Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan (Studi Kasus Nomor: 300/Pid.B/2015/PN.DPs dan Nomor: 65/PK/Pid/2019)

Abstract

A notary is a public official of the legal profession who has the authority to render public service to the public in accordance with morals, professional ethics and laws. As an ordinary human notary in the discharge of his office was not free of a fault or a violation. A notary who is convicted of a violation of duties and prohibitions contained in chapters 16 and 17 of the laws of notary office (uujn) can be charged with civil sanctions, administrative sanctions, sanctions of a code of ethics and criminal penalties. But sanctions contained in the uujn consisted of only civil sanctions, administrative sanctions and code penalties, notarial sanctions against notaries were not contained but were subject to the current criminal legislation of criminal legislation. As for the problem with this paper to discuss more in regard to notary conduct of embezzlement, it is how the legal arrangement relates to notary conduct of embezzlement, how the enforcement of judicial misconduct on the notary which committed the crimes of embezzlement was how the enforcement of law dealt with the notary that committed the crimes of embezzlement was conducted, how the policing of criminal law on the notary that committed the crimes of embezzlement.

The method used in this study was normative-juridical, a method based on literature studies to obtain materials that fit the material. This study is done with a two-judge analysis of the ruling.

Based on research and discussions, legal arrangements regarding the embezzlement of the notary public are regulated in section 372 of kuhpenal. The notary guidelines for incorporation which did so in the light of the judge's terms of jurisdiction and nonjurisdiction. The penal policy on the penal penal penal has been the penal policy and the nonpenal policy before the crime took place.